Сervical microdiscectomy: method and surgical strategy

Authors

  • Valeriy Olkhov Vinnytsa Regional Psychoneurological Hospital, Vinnytsa, Ukraine
  • Kostyantyn Horbatyuk Vinnytsa Regional Psychoneurological Hospital, Vinnytsa, Ukraine
  • Oleksiy Stoliarenko Vinnytsa Regional Psychoneurological Hospital, Vinnytsa, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.86579

Keywords:

herniated disc, surgical treatment, cervical microdiscectomy, interlaminar approach

Abstract

Objective. To implement the interlaminar lateral approach for extraction of herniated discs (HD) in the cervical spine.

Materials and methods. During 2012–2015 in Regional psychoneurological hospital 56 patients with cervical HD were operated. There were 22 females, 36 males among them. Disc herniation at the CV–CVI level occurred in 21 cases, CVI–CVII in 20 cases. The main disease signs were cervicalgia, monoradiculopathy. Fifty patients with medial hernia were operated using anterior cervical microscopic discectomy approach to HP extraction and intervertebral cage implantation (PEEK material). Six patients with lateral hernia were operated using posterior interlaminar cervical microdiscectomy. Anterior approach was performed by a standard method using CODMAN retractor, high-speed drill Stryker TPS. The posterior interlaminar approach was performed using paramedian incision 3 cm, intermuscular approach to the posterior lateral mass and arch on the affected side with Medtronic Metrix system followed by interlaminectomy performed by high-speed drill not more than 1 cm that was rather enough for hernia extraction from under nerve root.

Results. In all cases we managed to achieve the regression of radicular and cervicalgia syndromes. No complications were fixed during both surgical approaches. There was no difference observed in duration of surgical intervention using both methods, which was about (64±12) min. All patients were verticalized and activated in 3–4 hours after surgery.

Conclusion. Cervical microdiscectomy is a standard method for cervical HD surgery. The posterior interlaminar approach is an effective method used for lateral herniations, especially sequestered ones. It promotes the preservation of intervertebral disc and reduction of the total cost of surgery due to no necessity to use the implants-prosthesis. We suppose the posterior cervical microdiscectomy of lateral, sequestered intervertebral disc herniations in cervical spine to become a standard method of treatment.

Author Biographies

Valeriy Olkhov, Vinnytsa Regional Psychoneurological Hospital, Vinnytsa

Neurosurgery Department

Kostyantyn Horbatyuk, Vinnytsa Regional Psychoneurological Hospital, Vinnytsa

Neurosurgery Department

Oleksiy Stoliarenko, Vinnytsa Regional Psychoneurological Hospital, Vinnytsa

Neurosurgery Department

References

Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery. Tampa, Fla.: Greenberg Graphics; 2010.

Dohrmann GJ, Hsieh JC. Long-term results of anterior versus posterior operations for herniated cervical discs: analysis of 6,000 patients. Med Princ Pract. 2014;23(1):70-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Iyer S, Kim HJ. Cervical radiculopathy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9(3):272-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Finn MA, MacDonald JD. C2-3 anterior cervical fusion: technical report. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 May 11. [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed]

Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(19):2047-51. [PubMed]

Kerry G, Hammer A, Ruedinger C, Ranaie G, Steiner HH. Microsurgical posterior cervical foraminotomy: a study of 181 cases. Br J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul 11:1-6. [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed]

Russell SM, Benjamin V. Posterior surgical approach to the cervical neural foramen for intervertebral disc disease. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(3):662-6. [PubMed]

Daglı M, Er U, Simşek S, Bavbek M. Late results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody cages. Asian Spine J. 2013;7(1):34-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Korinth M, Krьger A, Oertel M, Gilsbach J. Posterior foraminotomy or anterior discectomy with polymethyl methacrylate interbody stabilization for cervical soft disc disease: results in 292 patients with monoradiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31(11):1207-14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Skovrlj B, Gologorsky Y, Haque R, Fessler RG, Qureshi SA. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Spine J. 2014;14(10):2405-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Caglar YS, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, Tuna H, Bakir A, Torun F, Ugur HC. Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50(1):7-11. [PubMed]

Published

2016-12-17

How to Cite

Olkhov, V., Horbatyuk, K., & Stoliarenko, O. (2016). Сervical microdiscectomy: method and surgical strategy. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, (4), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.86579

Issue

Section

Original articles