Criteria of objectification diagnostics and indicators of quality of vestibular schwannoma surgical treatment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.72610

Keywords:

vestibular schwannoma, diagnosis, clinical symptoms, treatment, quality of life

Abstract

The article is sanctified to the problem of standardization and objectification diagnosis and the development of indicators of the quality of surgical treatment of patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS).

Purpose. Objectification and standardization of diagnostic criteria and indicators of the quality of surgical treatment of patients with VS accordance to international standards.

Materials and methods. Locations retro prospective analysis of complex examination results and treatment of 227 patients with VS were in The State institution Institute of  neurosurgery named after acad. A.P. Romodanov of AMN of Ukraine for the period from 2005 to the present. In our series of supervisions of ВШ more often (in two times) diagnosed for women by age 60 from 40 to (to 40% of all supervisions) with an average duration of history about 4 years. All observations of this study verified histologically.

Results. System multivariate analysis of clinical manifestations and symptoms of VS on a large array of data has allowed us to develop and implement a standardized integrated circuit otoneurological examination of patients to improve the effectiveness of early diagnosis of tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Worked out a range of quality indicators of surgical treatment of patients with VS. Scale provides objective evidence and indicators required to assess the initial condition of the patients, the dynamic control of neurological disorders during the treatment and / or evaluation of the completed rehabilitation course. The scale is evaluated 11 clinical signs expressed by rank. The boundaries of the total score range corresponding to: neurological disorders (focal neurological deficit) of mild severity score 0-8; neurological disorders moderate severity 9-24 points; focal neurological deficits heavy severity of 25-41 points. This system allows to forecast the flow of disease and potential answer for rehabilitation events.

Conclusions. Offered numerical score of surgery quality indicators for VS should be integrated into the overall scheme of assessment examination of the patient with the assistance of objective instrumental methods of examination. This evaluation is required in the preoperative period and in dynamics.

In some cases, such an assessment is not only the clinical but also the expert value, objectifies and justify the cost of treatment and the amount of the insurance policy, determines the patient’s social adaptation. The proposed scale of assessment of the quality indicators of surgical treatment of patients with VS brings a solution to the international standards.

Author Biographies

Eugene Pedachenko, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev

Director

Oksana Skobska, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev

Otoneurology Department

Aleksandra Malysheva, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev

Otoneurology Department

References

1. Russell DS, Rubinstein LJ. Pathology of tumours of the nervous system. London: Edward Arnold; 1989.

2. Macfarlane R, King TT. Acoustic neurinomas (vestibular schwannoma). In: Kaye AH, Laws ER, editors. Brain tumors. An encyclopedic approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:577-622

3. Miller NR. Tumors of cranial and peripheral nerves. In: NR Miller, editor. Walsh and Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1988:1543-67.

4. Newton HB. Primary brain tumors: review of etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 1994 Mar;49(4):787-97. [PubMed]

5. Tos M, Charabi S, Thomsen J. Clinical experience with vestibular schwannomas: epidemiology, symptomatology, diagnosis, and surgical results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255(1):1-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Tos M, Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos T, Thomsen J. What is the real incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Feb;130(2):216-20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Pedachenko EG, Skobska OE, Gudkov VV, Malysheva AYu. Problems with diagnosis of a vestibular schwannomas. Ukr Neurosurg J. 2014(10:53-7. Russian.

8. Nikitin IA. Khirurgiya bol’shikh i gigantskikh nevrinom VIII nerva [Surgery of large and giant neuromas of the VIII nerve] [dissertation]. Leningrad (Russia): Polenov Neurosurgery Institute; 1989. Russian.

9. Slattery WH 3rd, Francis S, House KC. Perioperative morbidity of acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2001 Nov;22(6):895-902. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10. Bennett M, Haynes DS. Surgical approaches and complications in the removal of vestibular schwannomas. 2007. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008 Apr;19(2):331-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11. Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): surgical management and results with an emphasis on complications and how to avoid them. Neurosurgery. 1997 Jan;40(1):11-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ, Harner SG. Residual and recurrent acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope. 1987 Oct;97(10):1168-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. El-Kashlan HK, Zeitoun H, Arts HA, Hoff JT, Telian SA. Recurrence of acoustic neuroma after incomplete resection. Am J Otol. 2000 May;21(3):389-92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14. Sanna M, Falcioni M, Taibah A, De Donato G, Russo A, Piccirillo E. Treatment of residual vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Nov;23(6):980-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. Ramina R, Coelho Neto M, Bordignon KC, Mattei T, Clemente R, Pires Aguiar PH. Treatment of large and giant residual and recurrent vestibular schwannomas. Skull Base. 2007 Mar;17(2):109-17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Sanna M, Khrais T, Russo A, Piccirillo E, Augurio A. Hearing preservation surgery in vestibular schwannoma: the hidden truth. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004 Feb;113(2):156-63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17. Jacob A, Robinson LL Jr, Bortman JS, Yu L, Dodson EE, Welling DB. Nerve of origin, tumor size, hearing preservation, and facial nerve outcomes in 359 vestibular schwannoma resections at a tertiary care academic center. Laryngoscope. 2007 Dec;117(12):2087-92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18. Backous DD, Pham HT. Guiding patients through the choices for treating vestibular schwannomas: balancing options and ensuring informed consent. 2007. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008 Apr;19(2):379-92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19. Malis LI. Nuances in acoustic neuroma surgery. Neurosurgery. 2001 Aug;49(2):337-41. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20. Samii M, Gerganov VM, Samii A. Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2010 Apr;112(4):860-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21. McClelland S 3rd, Guo H, Okuyemi KS. Morbidity and mortality following acoustic neuroma excision in the United States: analysis of racial disparities during a decade in the radiosurgery era. Neuro Oncol. 2011 Nov;13(11):1252-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Pace A, Villani V, Zucchella C. Quality of life of brain tumor patients. Eur. Assoc. NeuroOncol. Mag. 2012;2:118-22.

23. Dirven L, Reijneveld JC, Taphoorn MJ. Health-related quality of life or quantity of life: a difficult trade-off in primary brain tumors? Semin Oncol. 2014 Aug;41(4):541-52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Aaronson NK. Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured? Oncology (Williston Park). 1988 May;2(5):69-76. [PubMed]

25. Acoustic Neuroma. NIH Consens Statement;1991:53:1-24.

Published

2016-06-26

How to Cite

Pedachenko, E., Skobska, O., & Malysheva, A. (2016). Criteria of objectification diagnostics and indicators of quality of vestibular schwannoma surgical treatment. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, (2), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.72610

Issue

Section

Original articles