Dynamics of neurophysiological parameters in patients with consequences of cervical spine injury under epidural electrostimulation





cervical spine trauma, epidural electrostimulation, diagnostics, evoked motor potentials


Introduction. Method of epidural electrostimulation (EES) is considered to be one of the most promising areas of renewing surgery of the spinal cord.

Materials and methods. The results of treatment of 80 patients (90% — men, 10% — women) with consequences of cervical spine injury of different severity were analyzed. Clinical and neurological, neurophysiological (NPh) methods, including electroneuromyography (ENMG) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) registration were used.

Results. Using EES method in patients with spinal trauma consequences the improvement of cortical-spinal conductivity was achieved, in 76 (95%)  — certain renewing of movement in a particular group of muscles. A direct correlation between results of motor recovery after EES according to clinical evaluation and MEP indices was found (r=0,6, P <0,01) in patients from different groups.

Conclusions. Clinical and NPh tests allow to estimate quantity of spinal cord conducting functions disorders before operation and provides objective criteria for evaluation of surgery effectiveness in patients with consequences of cervical spine injury.

Author Biographies

Lidiya Chebotariova, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev

Department of Functional Diagnostics

Albina Tretiakova, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev

Department of Functional Diagnostics

Iuriy Iaminskiy, Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev

Restorative Neurosurgery Department


1. Fehlings M, Perrin R. The role and timing of early decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: Update with a review of recent clinical evidence. Injury. 2005;36(2):S13-S26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Rabinowitz R, Eck J, Harper C et al. Urgent Surgical Decompression Compared to Methylprednisolone for the Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord Injury. Spine. 2008;33(21):2260-2268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Hamid S, Hayek R. Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: an overview. European Spine Journal. 2008;17(9):1256-1269. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Lavrov I, Courtine G, Dy C et al. Facilitation of Stepping with Epidural Stimulation in Spinal Rats: Role of Sensory Input. Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28(31):7774-7780. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5. Oakley J, Prager J. Spinal Cord Stimulation. Spine. 2002;27(22):2574-2583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Gekht B, Kasatkina L, Samoylov M, Sanadze A. Elektromiografiya V Diagnostike Nervno-Myshechnykh Zabolevaniy [Electromyography In The Diagnosis Of Neuromuscular Diseases]. Taganrog: Izd-vo TRTU; 1997. Russian.

7. Zenkov L, Ronkin M. Funktsionalnaya Diagnostika Nervnykh Bolezney: Rukovodstvo Dlya Vrachey [Functional Diagnosis Of Nervous Diseases: Guidance For Doctors]. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2004. Russian.

8. Nikitin S, Kurenkov A. Metodicheskiye Osnovy Transkranialnoy Magnitnoy Stimulyatsii V Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii: Rukovodstvo Dlya Vrachey [Methodical Bases Of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation In Neurology And Psychiatry: A Guide For Doctors]. Moscow: OOO «IPTS MASKA»; 2006. Russian.

9. Tsymbalyuk V, Yaminskyy Y. Rekonstruktyvno-Vidnovna Khirurhiya Spynnoho Mozku [Reconstructive Surgery Of The Spinal Cord]. Kiev: Avitsena; 2009. Ukrainian.



How to Cite

Chebotariova, L., Tretiakova, A., & Iaminskiy, I. (2012). Dynamics of neurophysiological parameters in patients with consequences of cervical spine injury under epidural electrostimulation. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, (4), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.55641



Original articles