Optimization of surgical treatment of combination of cerebral aneurysms and head magistral arteries stenosis and occlusion

Authors

  • Yuri Cherednychenko Endovascular Center, Mechnikov Dnepropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Andriy Miroshnychenko Endovascular Center, Mechnikov Dnepropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Mykola Zorin Department of Neurological Disease and Neurosurgery, Dnepropetrovsk State Medical Academy, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Lyudmila Dzyak Department of Neurological Disease and Neurosurgery, Dnepropetrovsk State Medical Academy, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Sergiy Grygoruk Department of Vascular Neurosurgery, Mechnikov Dnepropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Illya Plyushchev Department of Vascular Neurosurgery, Mechnikov Dnepropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Natalia Cherednychenko Department of Roentgenology, Dnipropetrovsk City Clinical Hospital №2, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • Yuri Novik Mechnikov Dnepropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.50114

Keywords:

occlusive and stenotic disease, head magistral arteries, stenosis, cerebral aneurysm, angioplasty, stenting, coiling, endarterectomy, clipping

Abstract

Objective. Determination of the optimal strategy of surgical treatment of patients with a combination of cerebral aneurysms and head magistral arteries stenosis.

Methods. 26 patients with combination of cerebral aneurysms and head magistral arteries stenosis, whose age was between 44 and 84 years, have been examined and treated in the Cerebrovascular Clinic of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Hospital for the last 4 years. 21 of them were operated, 5 – abstained. 24 endovascular and 8 open operations were performed in different combinations.

Results. All cases were divided into 3 groups according to the application different tactics of surgical treatment. Group 1 - 10 patients were operated in order to exclude cerebral aneurysm and revascularize head magistral arteries. Group 2 - 5 patients were operated to remove only the head magistral arteries stenosis. Group 3 - 6 patients were operated to exclude cerebral aneurysm alone. Functional outcomes evaluated by the modified Rankin scale and were the best in group 1.

Conclusion. Surgical risks in case of treatment only one of pathology in case of combination of head magistral arteries stenosis and cerebral aneurysms may cause clinical manifestation of the other one. One-session surgical treatment of cerebral aneurysms and head magistral arteries stenosis based on data about the peculiarities of collateral bloodcirculation, cerebrovascular reserves, degree hemoperfusion deficit in different arterial basins is the best strategy of surgical treatment.

Author Biography

Yuri Novik, Mechnikov Dnepropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk

Department of Vascular Neurosurgery

References

1. Ballotta E, Giau G, Manara R, Baracchini C. Extracranial Severe Carotid Stenosis and Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2006;20(1):5-8. [CrossRef]

2. Griffiths P, Worthy S, Gholkar A. Incidental intracranial vascular pathology in patients investigated for carotid stenosis. Neuroradiology. 1996;38(1):25-30. [CrossRef]

3. Kappelle, L, Eliasziw M, Fox A, Barnett H. Small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms and management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Neurology. 2000;55(2):307-309. [CrossRef]

4. Borkon M, Hoang H, Rockman C, Mussa F, Cayne N, Riles T, Jafar J, Veith F, Adelman M, Maldonado T. Concomitant Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Institutional Review of Patients Undergoing Carotid Revascularization. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2014;28(1):102-107. [CrossRef]

5. Liang Y, Wang J, Li B. Coexistence of internal carotid artery stenosis with intracranial aneurysm. Int. J. Stroke. 2014;9(3):306-307. [CrossRef]

6. Navaneethan S, Kannan V, Osowo A, Shrivastava R, Singh S. Concomitant intracranial aneurysm and carotid artery stenosis: a therapeutic dilemma. S. Med. J. 2014;99(7):757-758. [CrossRef]

7. Kono K, Masuo O, Nakao N, Meng H. De Novo Cerebral Aneurysm Formation Associated With Proximal Stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2014; 73(6):1080-1090. [CrossRef]

8. Sámano A, Ishikawa T, Moroi J, Yamashita S, Suzuki A, Yasui N. Ruptured de novo posterior communicating artery aneurysm associated with arteriosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery at the supraclinoid portion. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2011;2(1):35. [CrossRef]

9. Gallego Leon JI, Concepcion Aramendia L, Ballenilla Marco F, Vazquez Suarez JC. Concomitant Endovascular Treatment of Concomitant Extracranial Carotid Stenosis and Intracranial Aneurysm: Our Experience. Interv. Neuroradiol. 2009;15(1):53-59. [CrossRef]

10. Adams H. Carotid Stenosis and Coexisting Ipsilateral Intracranial Aneurysm. Arc. Neurol. 1977;34(8):515-526. [CrossRef]

11. Ladowski JS, Webster MW, Yonas HO, Steed DL. Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Asymptomatic Intracranial Aneurysm. Ann. Surg. 1984;200(1):70-73. [PubMed]

12. Pappada G, Fiori L., Marina R, Vaiani S, Gaini S. Management of symptomatic carotid stenoses with coincidental intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir, 1996;138(12):1386-1390. [CrossRef]

13. Kim S, Park D, Lee N, Kang S, Lim D, Chung Y. Coil Embolization of a Ruptured Basilar Tip Aneurysm Associated with Bilateral Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: A Case Report and Literature Review. J. Cerebrovasc. Endovasc. Neurosurg. 2012;4(1):44. [CrossRef]

14. Iwata T, Mori T, Tajiri H. Successful Staged Endovascular Treatment of a Symptomatic Cervical Carotid Bifurcation Stenosis Coupled with a Coincidental Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm in the Carotid Distal Segment. Am J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29(10):1948-1950. [CrossRef]

15. Shumann M, Mirzai S, Samil M, Vorkapic P. Xenon/CT CBF measurements as valuable diagnostic tool in a case of bilateral occlusive cerebrovascular disease associated with intracranial aneurysm. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1996;93:104-109. [CrossRef]

16. Gao X, Liang G, Li Z, Wei X, Wang X, Zhang H, Feng S, Lin J. Wingspan stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms with symptomatic parent artery stenosis: Experience in 35 patients with mid-term follow-up results. Eur. J. Radiol, 2012;81(5):750-756. [CrossRef]

17. Radak D, Sotirovic V, Tanaskovic S, Isenovic E. Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients With Carotid Disease: Not So Rare As We Think. Angiology, 2013;65(1):12-16. [CrossRef]

18. Cho Y, Jung K, Roh J, Kang H, Han M, Lim J. Characteristics of intracranial aneurysms associated with extracranial carotid artery disease in South Korea. Clin.Neurol. Neurosury, 2013;115(9):1677-1681. [CrossRef]

19. Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis. New Eng. J. Med. 1991;325(7):445-453. [CrossRef]

20. Gupta V, Chinchure S, Goel G, Jha A, Gupta A, Narang K. Coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms with ipsilateral carotid stenosis; technical considerations. Turk. Neurosurg. 2014;24(4):587-592. [CrossRef]

Published

2015-09-16

How to Cite

Cherednychenko, Y., Miroshnychenko, A., Zorin, M., Dzyak, L., Grygoruk, S., Plyushchev, I., Cherednychenko, N., & Novik, Y. (2015). Optimization of surgical treatment of combination of cerebral aneurysms and head magistral arteries stenosis and occlusion. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, (3), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.50114

Issue

Section

Original articles