Modern sight on treatment tactic in different clinical features of spondylogenic lumbar radiculopathy

Authors

  • Mykola Polishchuk Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education of Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Eugene Slynko Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Andriy Muravskiy Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education of Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Anatoliy Korotkoruchko Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education of Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Anatoliy Kosinov Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Anatoliy Pastushin Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Mykhaylo Tsymbal Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

Keywords:

degenerative disc disease, lumbar spine, treatment, indications

Abstract

Because of the often long time pain-conditional impairment of the patients as well as the varied therapy-possibilities, the treatment of the lumbar intervertebral disc represents a special challenge. The main aim of the study was to deal with different therapeutic and surgical treatment according to clinical manifestation and stage of disease. The indication to the operation for the lumbar disk-herniation results from the malfunctions of the nerve roots, the pains, as well as the progression disease symptoms. New and important developments have given the introduction of micro-surgical operation-techniques and different minimally invasive methods. In the current study were detailed the surgical approaches to diskogenic radiculopathy in different stades of spondylosis and discussed the relationship between the pathology stage and surgical tactic.

References

1. Pedachenko E, Kosinov A, Khizhnyak M, Tanaseychuk A. хSurgical treatment for discogenic sciatica - the choice of method, results and prospectsъ. Ukr zhurn maloinvazivnoii ta yendoskopichnoii khirurgii. 1997;1:86. Russian.

2. Polishchuk M, Mykhaylovsʹkyy V, Kosinov A, et al. [The effectiveness of surgery in the pathology of intervertebral discs]. Ukr zhurn maloinvazivnoii ta endoskopichnoii khirurgii. 1997;1:94-99. Russian.

3. Davis H. Increasing Rates of Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States, 1979–1990. Spine. 1994;19(Supplement):1117-1122. [CrossRef]

4. Findlay G, Hall B, Musa B, Oliveira M, Fear S. A 10-Year Follow-Up of the Outcome of Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Spine. 1998;23(10):1168-1171. [CrossRef]

5. Javid M, Hadar E. Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1998;89(1):1-7. [CrossRef]

6. Kutschera H, Lack W, Buchelt M, Beer R. Comparative sudy of surface displacement in discs following chemonucleolysis and lasernucleotomy. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;22(5):275-280. [CrossRef]

7. Magnaes B. [Sciatica — diagnosis and surgical management]. Nord Med. 1998 Sep;113(7):233-234. Norwegian. [PubMed]

8. Merlo A. What is the role of minimal invasive endoscopic surgery in treatment of lumbar disc hernias? Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998 Apr 29;87(18):607-609. German. [PubMed]

9. Schwetlick G. [Microsurgery in lumbar disc operations. Possibilities, methods and results]. Orthopade. 1998 Jul;27(7):457-465. German. [PubMed]

10. Slotman G, Stein S. Laminectomy Compared with Laparoscopic Diskectomy and Outpatient Laparoscopic Diskectomy for Herniated L5–S1 Intervertebral Disks. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 1998;8(5):261-267.

11. Wittenberg R, Lutke A, Logwitz D, et al. The correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and the operative and clinical findings after lumbar microdiscectomy. Int Orthop. 1998; 22(4):241-244. [PubMed]

How to Cite

Polishchuk, M., Slynko, E., Muravskiy, A., Korotkoruchko, A., Kosinov, A., Pastushin, A., & Tsymbal, M. Modern sight on treatment tactic in different clinical features of spondylogenic lumbar radiculopathy. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, (2), 104–107. Retrieved from https://theunj.org/article/view/48431

Issue

Section

Original articles