Use of C reactive protein (CRP) and creatine kinase (CK) as predictors of early postoperative infection after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Authors

  • Hai Huu Huynh Nguyen Department of Neurosurgery, Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh city, Viet Nam
  • Phi Duong Nguyen Orthopaedic - Burn - Plastic Surgery Department, City Children’s Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Khang Trien Truong Department of Orthopedic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.349330

Keywords:

C reactive protein, creatine kinase, postoperative infection, minimally invasive spine surgery, MIS TLIF

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is increasingly used for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease. Despite reduced soft‑tissue trauma, early postoperative infection remains a clinically relevant complication and may be difficult to recognize in the early phase. C‑reactive protein (CRP) and creatine kinase (CK) are routinely available laboratory markers reflecting inflammatory response and muscle injury, respectively. This study aimed to evaluate the association between postoperative CRP and CK kinetics and early postoperative infection following MIS‑TLIF.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 60 patients who underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and MIS‑TLIF between May and November 2022 at Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. Serum CRP and CK levels were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Postoperative infection was diagnosed based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria and included both surgical site and extra‑surgical site infections. Pain outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t‑tests or Wilcoxon tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests for independent samples.

Results: Six patients (10%) developed postoperative infections, including two deep infections, one superficial infection, and three extra‑surgical site infections. In the overall cohort, CRP peaked on POD 3 and gradually declined, with 76% of patients returning to normal levels by POD 14. In infected patients, CRP showed a higher peak and a delayed decline, with a secondary elevation observed after POD 7. CRP levels differed significantly between infected and non‑infected groups on POD 10 and POD 14 (p < 0.05). In contrast, CK peaked on POD 3 and normalized in most patients by POD 10, with no significant differences between groups. VAS scores for back and leg pain improved significantly one week after surgery.

Conclusion: Serial CRP is a useful supportive marker associated with early postoperative infection when interpreted serially and in conjunction with clinical findings after MIS‑TLIF, particularly when CRP fails to decline or increases again after PODs 7–10. CK reflects postoperative muscle injury but does not provide additional diagnostic value for infection detection. CRP trends should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings to guide early diagnosis and management.

References

1. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S26-35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Dowdell J, Brochin R, Kim J, Overley S, Oren J, Freedman B, Cho S. Postoperative Spine Infection: Diagnosis and Management. Global Spine J. 2018 Dec;8(4 Suppl):37S-43S. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

3. Mok JM, Pekmezci M, Piper SL, Boyd E, Berven SH, Burch S, Deviren V, Tay B, Hu SS. Use of C-reactive protein after spinal surgery: comparison with erythrocyte sedimentation rate as predictor of early postoperative infectious complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4):415-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Bišćević M, Bišćević S, Ljuca F, Smrke BU, Krupić F, Habul Ć. Postoperative infections after posterior spondylodesis of thoracic and lumbal spine. Surgical spine infections. Psychiatr Danub. 2014 Dec;26 Suppl 2:382-6. [PubMed]

5. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Bulsara KR, Favors M, Thramann J. Safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and intervertebral recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Dec;3(6):436-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Kulkarni AG, Patel RS, Dutta S. Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections? Asian Spine J. 2016 Dec;10(6):1000-1006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

7. Thelander U, Larsson S. Quantitation of C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Apr;17(4):400-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Larsson S, Thelander U, Friberg S. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after elective orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):237-42. [PubMed]

9. Griffith M, Shaw KA, Baird M, Rushford P, Shaw V, Roberts A, Gloystein DM. Defining the Normal Trends of Serum Creatine Kinase Levels Following Spinal Surgery. Asian Spine J. 2019 Jun;13(3):386-394. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

10. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control. 1992 Oct;20(5):271-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11. Hoeller S, Roch PJ, Weiser L, Hubert J, Lehmann W, Saul D. C-reactive protein in spinal surgery: more predictive than prehistoric. Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1261-1269. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Kang BU, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Choi WC, Choi YG. Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: detection and management based on serial C-reactive protein measurements. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Aug;13(2):158-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Shetty S, Ethiraj P, Shanthappa AH. C-reactive Protein Is a Diagnostic Tool for Postoperative Infection in Orthopaedics. Cureus. 2022 Feb 16;14(2):e22270. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

14. Ahmed SK, Shahzad MG, Iftikhar S. Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein to rule out infectious complications following hip fracture surgery. Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Jul-Aug;38(6):1514-1519. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

15. Maleitzke T, Zhou S, Zocholl D, Fleckenstein FN, Back DA, Plewe JM, Weber J, Winkler T, Stöckle U, Tsitsilonis S, Märdian S. Routine laboratory parameters predict intensive care unit admission and hospitalization in patients suffering stab injuries. Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 5;13:959141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

16. Youn G, Choi MK, Kim SB. Comparison of Inflammatory Markers Changes in Patients Who Used Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics within 24 Hours after Spine Surgery and 5 Days after Spine Surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Nov;65(6):834-840. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

17. Suryawanshi A, Patkar H, Aute S, Rathi PC, Rathi CL, Risbud SP, Ganu GP. Systemic enzyme therapy for postoperative inflammation and wound healing after orthopedic surgery: a randomized, placebo and active controlled clinical study. Sci Rep. 2025 Oct 2;15(1):34336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Nguyen, H. H. H., Nguyen, P. D., & Truong, K. T. (2026). Use of C reactive protein (CRP) and creatine kinase (CK) as predictors of early postoperative infection after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, 32(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.349330

Issue

Section

Original articles