A stage-based approach to pain syndrome management in patients with warfare injuries to the peripheral nerves of the extremities

Authors

  • Andrii S. Lysak Department of reconstructive microsurgery and orthopaedic surgery, Main Medical Clinical Centre of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-8884
  • Anna Y. Kyrpychova Department of reconstructive microsurgery and orthopaedic surgery, Main Medical Clinical Centre of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8864-4561
  • Anna V. Loboda Department of anesthesiology and intensive care, Main Medical Clinical Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.339192

Keywords:

pain, nerve, warfare injury, neurolysis, nerve grafting, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI)

Abstract

Objective: To develop a stage-based treatment algorithm for pain syndrome in patients with warfare injuries to the peripheral nerves of the extremities and to determine the optimal timing for surgical intervention on peripheral nerves through analysis of the literature and our own clinical data.

Materials and methods: Pain management outcomes were analyzed in 1,053 patients with peripheral nerve injuries sustained during warfare. All patients underwent clinical and ultrasonographic examination, and pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients were divided into two treatment groups: primary conservative treatment and primary surgical treatment. The primary conservative treatment group included 265 patients who were managed using conservative methods (pharmacotherapy, nerve hydrodissection, administration of steroid anti-inflammatory agents, platelet-rich plasma injections, or botulinum toxin). The primary surgical treatment group comprised 788 patients with warfare injuries to the peripheral nerves of the extremities who required surgical nerve repair, including patients with painful neuromas after limb amputations. Pain intensity (VAS) was reassessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.

Results: Conservative treatment demonstrated satisfactory outcomes in cases of mild pain syndrome with maintained positive dynamics during the first month from treatment initiation. Surgical treatment of warfare injuries to peripheral nerves resulted in a stable and predictable effect in the majority of cases. However, in the long-term follow-up period, some patients experienced worsening of regenerative pain during skeletal muscle reinnervation. Patients with painful neuromas represented the most challenging subgroup, as pain in these cases was typically chronic and difficult to manage.

Conclusions: Patients with warfare injuries to the peripheral nerves of the extremities should undergo ultrasound examination. In the absence of nerve compression or irritation and with preserved anatomical continuity, treatment should begin with pharmacotherapy; if necessary, nerve hydrodissection or injection therapy with steroids or botulinum toxin may be performed. In cases of significant compression, nerve disruption, or lack of effect after conservative treatment within 6 weeks, surgical intervention is recommended.

References

1. Lysak A, Gaiovych V, Strafun S, Shypunov V. Ukrainian Orthopedic Trauma Experience in Managing Wartime Injuries of the Upper Extremity. Hand Clin. 2025 Aug;41(3):373-385. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Rivera JC, Glebus GP, Cho MS. Disability following combat-sustained nerve injury of the upper limb. Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):254-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Guriev S, Lysun D, Kushnir V, Satsyk S, Kurachenko І. Lower extremity amputations due to modern combat operations: clinical and anatomical aspect. TRAUMA. 2018;19(4):5-8. [CrossRef]

4. Tsema EV, Khomenko IP, Bespalenko AA, Buryanov OA, Mishalov VG, Kikh AY. Clinico-statistical investigation of the extremity amputation level in wounded persons. Klin. Khirurhiia. 2017;10:324-31. [CrossRef]

5. Dones I, Levi V. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Current Trends and Future Applications. Brain Sci. 2018 Jul 24;8(8):138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

6. Schestatsky P, Vidor L, Winckler PB, Araújo TG, Caumo W. Promising treatments for neuropathic pain. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014 Nov;72(11):881-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Papenhoff MC, Habig K, Schmitz C, Lundin S, Schreier D, Tineghe J, Dudda M. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) [Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) - State of the Art in Diagnostics and Therapy]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2023 Jun;161(3):337-352. German. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Malinowski MN, Jain S, Jassal N, Deer T. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain: expert opinion and 5-year outlook. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Dec;17(12):1293-1302. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9. Ciaramella A. Psychopharmacology of chronic pain. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;165:317-337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10. List EB, Klieverik V, Martin E, Krijgh DD, Henk Coert J. Prevalence of residual limb pain and neuromas after upper extremity amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2025 Dec;50(11):1440-1447. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

11. Morteza Bagi H, Ahmadi S, Tarighat F, Rahbarghazi R, Soleimanpour H. Interplay between exosomes and autophagy machinery in pain management: State of the art. Neurobiol Pain. 2022 Jun 9;12:100095. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

12. Issa CJ, Svientek SR, Dehdashtian A, Cederna PS, Kemp SWP. Pathophysiological and Neuroplastic Changes in Postamputation and Neuropathic Pain: Review of the Literature. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Sep 28;10(9):e4549. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

Published

2026-03-29

How to Cite

Lysak, A. S., Kyrpychova, A. Y., & Loboda, A. V. (2026). A stage-based approach to pain syndrome management in patients with warfare injuries to the peripheral nerves of the extremities. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, 32(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.339192

Issue

Section

Original articles