A Comprehensive assessment of surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes in craniovertebral junction anomalies with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation: An initial experience of 5 cases

Authors

  • Dharmikkumar Velani Department of Neurosurgery, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
  • Varshesh Shah Department of Neurosurgery, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
  • Krushi Soladhra Department of Neurosurgery, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
  • Renish Padhshala Department of Neurosurgery, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
  • Nazar Imam Department of Neurosurgery, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
  • Jaimin Modh Department of Neurosurgery, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
  • Arvind Verma Department of Neurosurgery, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.328442

Keywords:

craniovertebral junction, basilar invagination, atlantoaxial dislocation, posterior fixation;, surgical clinical, outcomes, case series

Abstract

Objective: The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) plays a pivotal role in stabilizing and facilitating movement within the craniospinal axis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, radiological characteristics and surgical outcomes in patients with CVJ anomalies associated with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of five patients with CVJ anomalies, who underwent surgical management at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (SVP) Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. They were analyzed for clinical characteristics, radiological parameters and various surgical procedures. Patient's clinical and radiological status was assessed pre- and postoperatively at discharge and at 6 months of follow-up. Nurick grading system and Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score was used. Radiological assessment was done by atlantodental interval (ADI), craniobasal angle, and craniometric lines.

Results: Most patients presented with neck pain, followed by motor weakness as the second most common symptom, while sensory deficits were the least frequent. Congenital atlantoaxial dislocation was the most prevalent CVJ anomaly observed. Clinically, significant postoperative improvements were observed in both Nurick grade and Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score. Radiological findings showed a reduction in the atlanto-dens interval (ADI), a less acute clivus-canal angle, and downward movement of the odontoid process in the postoperative period. All cases had favorable postoperative outcomes, with no mortality reported at the one-year follow-up, and the condition of all patients stabilized.

Conclusion: Favorable outcomes were achieved through posterior fixation without anterior exposure in selected cases. The key to achieving excellent clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications lay in a thorough preoperative evaluation, timely surgical intervention, and the selection of an individualized surgical technique.

References

1. Nakajima K, Onomura T, Tanida Y, Ishibashi I. Factors related to the severity of myelopathy in atlantoaxial instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jun 15;21(12):1440-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Vender JR, Houle PJ, Harrison S, McDonnell DE. Occipital-cervical fusion using the Locksley intersegmental tie bar technique: long-term experience with 19 patients. Spine J. 2002 Mar-Apr;2(2):134-41. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Goel A. Atlantoaxial joint jamming as a treatment for atlantoaxial dislocation: a preliminary report. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Jul;7(1):90-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Grob D, Magerl F. Operative Stabilisierung bei Frakturen von C1 und C2 [Surgical stabilization of C1 and C2 fractures]. Orthopade. 1987 Feb;16(1):46-54. German. [PubMed]

5. Hong JT, Lee SW, Son BC, Sung JH, Yang SH, Kim IS, Park CK. Analysis of anatomical variations of bone and vascular structures around the posterior atlantal arch using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Mar;8(3):230-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Sardhara J, Behari S, Mohan BM, Jaiswal AK, Sahu RN, Srivastava A, Mehrotra A, Lal H. Risk stratification of vertebral artery vulnerability during surgery for congenital atlanto-axial dislocation with or without an occipitalized atlas. Neurol India. 2015 May-Jun;63(3):382-91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Reilly TM, Sasso RC, Hall PV. Atlantoaxial stabilization: clinical comparison of posterior cervical wiring technique with transarticular screw fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Jun;16(3):248-53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Ahmed R, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH. Fusions at the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Oct;24(10):1209-24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9. Anderson RC, Ragel BT, Mocco J, Bohman LE, Brockmeyer DL. Selection of a rigid internal fixation construct for stabilization at the craniovertebral junction in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg. 2007 Jul;107(1 Suppl):36-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10. Goel A. Posterior atlantoaxial 'facetal' instability associated with cervical spondylotic disease. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):51-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

11. Oda I, Abumi K, Sell LC, Haggerty CJ, Cunningham BW, McAfee PC. Biomechanical evaluation of five different occipito-atlanto-axial fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Nov 15;24(22):2377-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Vale FL, Oliver M, Cahill DW. Rigid occipitocervical fusion. J Neurosurg. 1999 Oct;91(2 Suppl):144-50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Grob D, Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Froehlich M, Hayek J. Posterior occipitocervical fusion. A preliminary report of a new technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Mar;16(3 Suppl):S17-24. [PubMed]

14. Wertheim SB, Bohlman HH. Occipitocervical fusion. Indications, technique, and long-term results in thirteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jul;69(6):833-6. [PubMed]

15. Chandra PS, Goyal N, Chauhan A, Ansari A, Sharma BS, Garg A. The severity of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation correlates with sagittal joint inclination, coronal joint inclination, and craniocervical tilt: a description of new indexes for the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2014 Dec;10 Suppl 4:621-9; discussion 629-30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Chandra PS, Kumar A, Chauhan A, Ansari A, Mishra NK, Sharma BS. Distraction, compression, and extension reduction of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation: a novel pilot technique. Neurosurgery. 2013 Jun;72(6):1040-53; discussion 1053. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17. Crockard HA, Pozo JL, Ransford AO, Stevens JM, Kendall BE, Essigman WK. Transoral decompression and posterior fusion for rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 May;68(3):350-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18. Crockard HA. The transoral approach to the base of the brain and upper cervical cord. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Sep;67(5):321-5. [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

19. Crockard HA. Ventrale Zugänge zur oberen Halswirbelsäule [Ventral approaches to the upper cervical spine]. Orthopade. 1991 Apr;20(2):140-6. German. [PubMed]

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Velani, D., Shah, V., Soladhra, K., Padhshala, R., Imam, N., Modh, J., & Verma, A. (2025). A Comprehensive assessment of surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes in craniovertebral junction anomalies with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation: An initial experience of 5 cases. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, 31(4), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.328442

Issue

Section

Original articles