Percutaneous laser microdiscectomy in the treatment of multilevel protrusions and herniations of lumbar intervertebral discs

Authors

  • Mykola O. Zorin Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery of Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Dnipro State Medical University, Dnipro; Medical center "Endoscopic Neurosurgery", Dnipro, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1144-921X
  • Mykola M. Zorin Medical center "Endoscopic Neurosurgery", Dnipro; Department of Spinal Neurosurgery, Mechnikov Dnipropetrovsk Regional Hospital, Dnipro, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.324776

Keywords:

multilevel protrusions, multilevel herniations, percutaneous laser microdiscectomy

Abstract

Objective: To develop a clear treatment strategy for multilevel protrusions and herniations of the lumbar spine using the method of percutaneous laser microdiscectomy (PLMD).

Materials and Methods: The study involved 620 patients diagnosed with multilevel lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) protrusions and herniations, all of whom underwent PLMD. The patients ranged in age from 20 to 50 years, including 360 men and 260 women. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and 62% additionally underwent computed tomography. The patients were categorized into four groups: group I (n = 78): PLMD was performed at a single level with herniations characterized by posterior-central or paramedian localization and a sagittal size not exceeding 7 mm; group II (n = 24): PLMD was performed on discs with herniations similar to those in group I, but accompanied by protrusions at other levels (sagittal size 4–6 mm); group III (n = 380): PLMD was performed in a single session on two levels with protrusions (sagittal size 4–6 mm); group IV (n = 138): PLMD was performed in a single session on three levels with protrusions (sagittal size 4–6 mm). All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using a C-arm system (Phillips, Netherlands). Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) preoperatively and during the two-week postoperative period. Treatment outcomes after one month were assessed using the McNab scale. Long-term quality of life was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index.

Results: In Group I, the initial radicular pain (measured by VAS) was more severe but significantly decreased after one week postoperatively, while lumbar pain (lumbalgia) remained moderate over the two-week follow-up. In Group II, the reduction in radicular symptoms mirrored that of Group I, with the greatest treatment effect (d = 0.7, p < 0.05); however, lumbalgia only decreased after two weeks (p > 0.05). In Groups III and IV, radicular pain decreased similarly to Group II. However, in Group IV, the intensity of lumbalgia remained high and exceeded the baseline even after two weeks (p > 0.05). At the one-month follow-up, the highest rate of excellent outcomes was observed in Group I and the lowest in Group IV, though differences between the groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). These findings suggest that post-PLMD pain severity is largely influenced by lumbalgia rather than radicular pain.

Conclusions: Percutaneous laser microdiscectomy is an effective method for treating protrusions and non-sequestered small herniations of the lumbar spine. The method is most appropriate and efficient when performed in a single session for two symptomatic lumbar IVD protrusions. Although it is technically feasible to treat three symptomatic protrusions in a single session, such an approach is considered less advisable.

References

1. He S, Sun Z, Wang Y, Ma D, Tan W, Lai J. Combining YESS and TESSYS techniques during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for multilevel lumbar disc herniation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11240. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

2. Zorin MO, Ovcharenko DV, Shulga OM, Zorin MM. Surgical tactics for multilevel displacements of lumbar intervertebral discs. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal. 2019;25(4):57-63. [CrossRef]

3. Gugliotta M, da Costa BR, Dabis E, Theiler R, Jüni P, Reichenbach S, Landolt H, Hasler P. Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 21;6(12):e012938. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

4. Hashemi M, Falsafi M, Razzaghi MR, Dadkhah P, Taheri M, Delshad MH, Zali A. The Long-term Effects of Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression (PLDD) Treatment on Lumbar Disc Protrusion: A 2-Year Follow-up. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Fall;11(4):427-432. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

5. Erbas YC, Pusat S, Erdogan E. Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression: Retrospective Analysis of 197 Cases and Review of The Literature. Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(5):766-70. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Momenzadeh S, Koosha A, Kazempoor Monfared M, Bairami J, Zali A, Ommi D, Hosseini B, Hashemi M, Sayadi S, Aryani R, Nematollahi F, Nematollahi L, Barati M. The Effect of Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression on Reducing Pain and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Winter;10(1):29-32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

7. Choy DS. Percutaneous laser disc decompression: a 17-year experience. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004 Oct;22(5):407-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Brouwer PA, Brand R, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Jacobs WC, Schenk B, van den Berg-Huijsmans AA, Koes BW, Arts MA, van Buchem MA, Peul WC. Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica: Two-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;23(3):313-324. [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

9. Hellinger J, Stern S, Hellinger S. Nonendoscopic Nd-YAG 1064 nm PLDN in the treatment of thoracic discogenic pain syndromes. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003 Apr;21(2):61-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10. Budrovac D, Radoš I, Tot OK, Haršanji Drenjančević I, Omrčen I. Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain. Southeastern European Medical Journal: SEEMEDJ. 2020 Nov 12;4(2):62-8. https://scispace.com/pdf/percutaneous-laser-disc-decompression-in-the-treatment-of-3n1y0xpkw8.pdf

11. Gelalis I, Gkiatas I, Spiliotis A, Papadopoulos D, Pakos E, Vekris M, Korompilias A. Current Concepts in Intradiscal Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Procedures for Chronic Low Back Pain. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):657-669. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

12. Pedachenko EG, ed. [Diagnosis and surgical treatment of discogenic neurocompression syndromes of the spine]. Kyiv: VIK-PRINT, 2014. Ukrainian.

13. Zorin MO, Zorina TV, Zorin MM. Puncture laser microdiskectomy: 20-year experience. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal. 2018;(1):60-5. [CrossRef]

14. Malik K. Treatment of multilevel degenerative disc disease with intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Apr;35(2):289-93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. Maksymowicz W, Barczewska M, Sobieraj A. Percutaneous laser lumbar disc decompression - mechanism of action, indications and contraindications. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2004 Jun 30;6(3):314-8. [PubMed]

16. Lang TA, Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. ACP Press; 2006.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Zorin, M. O., & Zorin, M. M. (2025). Percutaneous laser microdiscectomy in the treatment of multilevel protrusions and herniations of lumbar intervertebral discs. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, 31(2), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.324776

Issue

Section

Original articles