Clinical and neuroimaging predictors of the outcome of microsurgical intervention against the background of cerebral aneurysms rupture

Authors

  • Viktoriya A. Kazantseva Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery of the Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Dnipro State Medical University, Dnipro, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0808-3520
  • Mykola O. Zorin Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery of the Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Dnipro State Medical University, Dnipro, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1144-921X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.294992

Keywords:

cerebral aneurysms, microsurgical intervention, clinical predictors of the outcome

Abstract

Objective: minimization of the risks of complications of microsurgical intervention (MI) for cerebral aneurysm (CA) rupture due to established clinical and neuroimaging predictors.

Material and methods. Evaluation of microsurgical treatment of 418 patients in the acute period of cerebral aneurysms (CA) rupture in the 2013-2018 period, that were operated at the Vascular Neurosurgery Center of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital named after I.I. Mechnikov, taking into account factors that may have an influence on favorable or unfavorable functional consequences. Age, gender, as well as clinical-neurological and neuroimaging assessment of the condition of patients according to the severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) according to the Hunt-Hess classification, WFNS, level of consciousness impairment according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were studied. The severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage was evaluated according to the Fisher prognostic scale according to the performed spiral computed tomography (SCT). Cerebral angiospasm (CAS) was evaluated according to cerebral angiography (CAG), and its severity according to transcranial dopplerography (TCD) on the day of hospitalization and surgery. The performed microsurgical intervention (MI) was evaluated according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The study was both retrospective and prospective.

Results. Among 77 (18.4%) patients with adverse consequences of MI according to 1-3 points of GOS, a dependence was reliably found on the level of consciousness disturbance according to GCS, the severity of meningeal and focal symptoms, the severity of parenchymal hemorrhage, CAS manifestations on the day of surgery according to TCD, the duration of surgery after the rupture of CA (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between age, sex, localization, form and side of CA rupture. Also, a strong inverse correlation was found between GCS and classification of SAH according to WFNS rs=‒0.96 (95% CI 0.96-0.97) and Hunt-Hess rs=‒0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.84) during hospitalization.

Conclusions. The effectiveness of MI in the case of CA rupture depends on the severity of prognostic criteria of clinical and neurological examination - evaluation by the GCS, neurological disorders, severity of parenchymal hemorrhage, manifestations of CAS on the day of surgery for TCD, the duration of surgery after CA rupture. Revealed relationship between the score according to the GOS, classifications of SAH according to the WFNS and Hunt-Hess significantly simplifies diagnostic measures during the examination of patients in the acute period of CA rupture.

References

1. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, Chou SH-Y, Cruz-Flores S, Dangayach NS, Derdeyn CP, Du R, Hänggi D, Hetts SW, Ifejika NL, Johnson R, Keigher KM, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Lucke-Wold B, Rabinstein AA, Robicsek SA, Stapleton CJ, Suarez JI, Tjoumakaris SI, Welch BG. 2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023 Jul;54(7):e314-e370. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Rincon F, Rossenwasser RH, Dumont A. The epidemiology of admissions of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the United States. Neurosurgery. 2013 Aug;73(2):217-22; discussion 212-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Maher M, Schweizer TA, Macdonald RL. Treatment of Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Guidelines and Gaps. Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1326-1332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Nascimento de Morais G, Rojas S. Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Early Brain Injury: A New Pathophysiological Perspective. Advances in Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment. 2023 Oct 4. [CrossRef]

5. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980 Jan;6(1):1-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Hu P, Zhou H, Yan T, Miu H, Xiao F, Zhu X, Shu L, Yang S, Jin R, Dou W, Ren B, Zhu L, Liu W, Zhang Y, Zeng K, Ye M, Lv S, Wu M, Deng G, Hu R, Zhan R, Chen Q, Zhang D, Zhu X. Deep learning-assisted identification and quantification of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in non-contrast CT scans: Development and external validation of Hybrid 2D/3D UNet. Neuroimage. 2023 Oct 1;279:120321. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Lee H, Perry JJ, English SW, Alkherayf F, Joseph J, Nobile S, Zhou LL, Lesiuk H, Moulton R, Agbi C, Sinclair J, Dowlatshahi D. Clinical prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun 1:1-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Darsaut TE, Keough MB, Chan AM, Farzin B, Findlay JM, Chow MM, Chagnon M, Zehr J, Gevry G, Raymond J. Transcranial Doppler Velocities and Angiographic Vasospasm after SAH: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jan;43(1):80-86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

9. Kumar G, Shahripour RB, Harrigan MR. Vasospasm on transcranial Doppler is predictive of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1257-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10. Rumalla K, Lin M, Ding L, Gaddis M, Giannotta SL, Attenello FJ, Mack WJ. Risk Factors for Cerebral Vasospasm in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Population-Based Study of 8346 Patients. World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:e233-e241. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11. Pavelka M, Necarsulmer J, Ho J, Sasaki-Adams D. Vasospasm risk following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in older adults. J Neurosurg. 2023 Apr 28;139(5):1302-1310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. D'Andrea G, Picotti V, Familiari P, Barbaranelli C, Frati A, Raco A. Impact of early surgery of ruptured cerebral aneurysms on vasospasm and hydrocephalus after SAH: Our preliminary results. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 May;192:105714. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Lytvak SO. [Individualization of microsurgical tactics during clipping cerebral arterial aneurysms]. Endovascular Neuroradiology. 2018 Dec 27;24(2):52–68. Ukrainian. [CrossRef]

14. Bindu AV, Orlov MY, Litvak SO, Yeleynik MV. Risk factors and clinical and neurological consequences of intraoperative rupture of brain aneurysms in microsurgical operations. Romanian Neurosurgery. 2020;34(1):66–76. [CrossRef]

15. Ditz C, Leppert J, Neumann A, Krajewski KL, Gliemroth J, Tronnier VM, Küchler J. Cerebral Vasospasm After Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Angiographic Pattern and Its Impact on the Clinical Course. World Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;138:e913-e921. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Dodd WS, Laurent D, Dumont AS, Hasan DM, Jabbour PM, Starke RM, Hosaka K, Polifka AJ, Hoh BL, Chalouhi N. Pathophysiology of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e021845. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

17. Zhang J, Lo YL, Li MC, Yu YH, Wu SY. Risk of Re-Rupture, Vasospasm, or Re-Stroke after Clipping or Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Long-Term Follow-Up with a Propensity Score-Matched, Population-Based Cohort Study. J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):1209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

18. Zhou Z, Liu Z, Yang H, Zhang C, Zhang C, Chen J, Wang Y. A nomogram for predicting the risk of poor prognosis in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage following microsurgical clipping. Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1146106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

19. de Jong G, Aquarius R, Sanaan B, Bartels RHMA, Grotenhuis JA, Henssen DJHA, Boogaarts HD. Prediction Models in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Forecasting Clinical Outcome With Artificial Intelligence. Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):E427-E434. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20. Dzyak LA, Zorin MO, Kazantseva VA. [The importance of angiospasm among the main negative prognostic factors of microsurgical treatment of hemorrhages of cerebral arterial aneurysms]. The Journal of neuroscience of B.M. Mankovsky. 2022;10(1-2):24-29. Ukrainian.

21. Oudshoorn SC, Rinkel GJ, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Dorhout Mees SM, Backes D, Algra A, Vergouwen MD. Aneurysm treatment <24 versus 24-72 h after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2014 Aug;21(1):4-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Taha MM, Alawamry A, Abdelbary TH. Outcome of microsurgical clipping of anterior circulation aneurysms during the period of vasospasm: single center experience in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 28;34(1). [CrossRef]

23. Hostettler IC, Lange N, Schwendinger N, Frangoulis S, Hirle T, Trost D, Gempt J, Kreiser K, Wostrack M, Meyer B. Duration between aneurysm rupture and treatment and its association with outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 27;13(1):1527. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

24. Etminan N, Macdonald RL. Neurovascular disease, diagnosis, and therapy: Subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral vasospasm. Handb Clin Neurol. 2021;176:135-169. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Kazantseva, V. A., & Zorin, M. O. (2024). Clinical and neuroimaging predictors of the outcome of microsurgical intervention against the background of cerebral aneurysms rupture. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, 30(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.294992

Issue

Section

Original articles