Parasagittal meningiomas: surgical treatment outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.259324Keywords:
parasagittal meningioma, parasagittal meningioma surgery, superior sagittal sinus, treatment outcomes, completeness, further growth, recurrencesAbstract
Purpose: to improve the outcomes of surgical treatment of parasagittal meningioma patients by implementing a differentiated approach to the choice of surgical intervention, given the preoperative assessment of patency of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and collateral venous circulation.
Materials and methods. Analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of 199 patients in the Department of Neurosurgery № 2, Mechnikov Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital was carried out. In the first follow-up period (2000 to 2012), the data were obtained retrospectively (95 cases). In the second follow-up period (2013 to 2021), the data were obtained prospectively (104 cases). The patients were assigned to the groups according to a differentiated approach (implemented in 2013) to the choice of surgical treatment tactics based on preoperative angiographic data (selective cerebral angiography and CT angiography).
Results. In the first follow-up period, the completeness of surgical resection according to Simpson Grading Scale was: type I, 23 (24.2%) cases; type II, 37 (38.9%) cases; type III, 13 (13.7%) cases; type IV, 22 23.2%) cases. 53.7% of patients had intraoperative or postoperative complications. Among patients with tumors of the middle third of the SSS, 21 (41.2%) had their neurological status improved postoperatively. Mortality rate was 4.2%. 14 (14.7%) patients had further parasagittal meningioma growth after its removal grade II–IV according to Simpson Scale.
In the second follow-up period, the completeness of surgical intervention according to Simpson Scale was: type I, 74 (71.2%) cases; type II, 26 (25%) cases; type III, 2 (1.9%) cases; type IV, 2 (1.9%) cases. 19.2% of patients had intraoperative or postoperative complications. Among the patients with tumors of the middle third of the SSS, 46 (79.3%) patients had postoperative improvement of neurological status. No lethal outcome was reported. 3 (2.9%) patients had further parasagittal meningioma growth after radical surgical removal according to Simpson grade II.
Conclusions. Adequate analysis of instrumental methods of brain study using cerebral vasculature study, application of neuronavigation station (with brain MRI and/or CT angiography data available) and new microsurgical techniques contributed to the completeness of surgery and minimally invasive removal of parasagittal meningioma with reduced intraoperative and postoperative complications, which affected the immediate and long-term treatment outcomes.
References
Gatterbauer B, Gevsek S, Höftberger R, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Ertl A, Mallouhi A, et al. Multimodal treatment of parasagittal meningiomas: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1249-1256. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161859
Zeeshan Q, Patel A, Cheng CY, Zhao NH, Barber J, Ghodke BV, et al. Resection of Meningiomas Involving Major Dural Venous Sinuses: Classification, Technique, and Long-Term Results. World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e521-e536. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.128
Gousias K, Schramm J, Simon M. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management. J Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;125(3):551-60. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.JNS15754
Giordan E, Sorenson TJ, Lanzino G. Optimal surgical strategy for meningiomas involving the superior sagittal sinus: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Apr;43(2):525-535. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1026-1
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
Ricci A, Di Vitantonio H, De Paulis D, Del Maestro M, Gallieni M, Dechcordi SR, et al. Parasagittal meningiomas: Our surgical experience and the reconstruction technique of the superior sagittal sinus. Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Jan 19;8:1. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.198728
Yin T, Gu J, Huang Y, Wei L, Gao J, Wang S. Assessment and Treatment of Peritumoral Cortical Veins in Parasagittal Meningiomas with Application of 3-Dimensional Imaging Fusion Model. World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.145
Escribano Mesa JA, Alonso Morillejo E, Parrón Carreño T, Huete Allut A, Narro Donate JM, Méndez Román P, et al. Risk of Recurrence in Operated Parasagittal Meningiomas: A Logistic Binary Regression Model. World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110: e112-e118. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.087
Bi N, Xu RX, Liu RY, Wu CM, Wang J, Chen WD, et al. Microsurgical treatment for parasagittal meningioma in the central gyrus region. Oncol Lett. 2013 Sep;6(3):781-784. doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1429
Сірко АГ, Перепелиця ВА, винахідник; Державна Установа "Інститут нейрохірургії ім. акад. А.П. Ромоданова Національної Академії Медичних Наук України", власник. Спосіб пластики дефекту верхнього сагітального синуса (ВСС) після видалення парасагітальної менінгіоми (ПМ), яка проросла 1 або 2 стінки ВСС, не викликаючи його оклюзії. Патент України 146105. 2020 Серпень 03.
Сірко АГ, Перепелиця ВА, винахідник; Державна Установа "Інститут нейрохірургії ім. акад. А.П. Ромоданова Національної Академії Медичних Наук України", власник. Спосіб пластичного закриття крайового дефекту верхнього сагітального синуса (ВСС) після тотального видалення (грація і за класифікацією Simpson) парасагітальної менінгіоми (ПМ), яка викликає обтурацію ВСС (градація VI за класифікацією Bonnel та Botchi), із збереженням шляхів колатерального кровотоку. Патент України 146106. 2020 Серпень 03.
Сірко АГ, Романуха ДМ, винахідник; Державна Установа "Інститут нейрохірургії ім. акад. А.П. Ромоданова Національної Академії Медичних Наук України", власник. Спосіб пластики дефекту твердої мозкової оболонки при ретросигмоподібному доступі. Патент України 141382. 2019 Липень 18.
Сірко АГ, Кирпа ІЮ, винахідник; Державна Установа "Інститут нейрохірургії ім. акад. А.П. Ромоданова Національної Академії Медичних Наук України", власник. Спосіб лікування хворих на конвекситальну супратенторіальну менінгіому головного мозку. Патент України 102963. 2015 Червень 02.
Сирко АГ, Зорин НА, Новик ЮЕ, Кирпа ИЮ, Шпонька ВИ. Применение навигационной системы Stealth Station® Treon®Plus в хирургии внутричерепных менингиом. Украинский нейрохирургический журнал. 2010;(1):39-46. doi:10.25305/unj.88763
Buerki RA, Horbinski CM, Kruser T, Horowitz PM, James CD, Lukas RV. An overview of meningiomas. Future Oncol. 2018 Sep;14(21):2161-2177. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0006
Abdallah OI, Clark D, Essibayi MA. Surgical Reconstruction of a Traumatic Superior Sagittal Sinus Injury Using Synthetic Vascular Graft in a Resource-Limited Civilian Field Hospital During the Syrian Civil War. World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.116
Li D, Jiang P, Xu S, Li C, Xi S, Zhang J, et al. Survival impacts of extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy for the modern management of high-grade meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 2019 Oct;145(1):125-134. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03278-w
Zhu H, Bi WL, Aizer A, Hua L, Tian M, Den J, et al. Efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy for atypical and anaplastic meningioma. Cancer Med. 2019 Jan;8(1):13-20. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1531
Bir SC, Konar SK, Maiti TK, Thakur JD, Guthikonda B, Nanda A. Utility of Neuronavigation in Intracranial Meningioma Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:546-555.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.101
Champeaux C, Jecko V, Houston D, Thorne L, Dunn L, Fersht N, et al. Malignant Meningioma: An International Multicentre Retrospective Study. Neurosurgery. 2019 Sep 1;85(3):E461-E469. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy610
Di Vitantonio H, De Paulis D, Del Maestro M, Ricci A, Dechordi SR, Marzi S, et al. Dural repair using autologous fat: Our experience and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Jul 7;7(Suppl 16):S463-8. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.185777
Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, Jenkinson MD, Sallabanda K, Houdart E, et al. EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):e383-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30321-7
Lemée JM, Corniola MV, Meling TR. Benefits of re-do surgery for recurrent intracranial meningiomas. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57254-5
Tomasi SO, Umana GE, Scalia G, Raudino G, Graziano F, Palmisciano P, et al. The Superficial Anastomosing Veins of the Human Brain Cortex: A Microneurosurgical Anatomical Study. Front Surg. 2022 Jan 10;8:817002. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.817002
von Spreckelsen N, Waldt N, Timmer M, Goertz L, Reinecke D, Laukamp K, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction of the KLF4K409Q Mutation in Meningioma. World Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;154:e665-e670. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.119
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrii H. Sirko, Vadym А. Perepelytsia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this Journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the Journal under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this Journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form of which it has been published by the Journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the Journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this Journal is included.
