Evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of spinal cord pathology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.112357Keywords:
патология спинного мозга, результаты хирургического лечения, качество жизниAbstract
No abstract.References
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Life Support Course Student Manual. — Chicago: Amer. Coll. Surg., 1989.
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Trauma Life Support. — Chicago: Amer. Coll. Surg., 1985.
American Spinal Injury Association: Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Patients. — Chicago: Amer. Spin. Injury Assoc., 1982.
American Spinal Injury Association: Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Patients. — Chicago, Amer. Spin. Injury Assoc., 1992.
Baker C.D., Pynsent P.B., Fairbank J.C.T. The Oswestry Disability Index revisited: Its reliability, repeatability and validity, and a comparison with the St. Thomas’s Disability Index // Back Pain: New Approaches to Education and Rehabilitation / Eds. M.O. Roland, J.R. Jenner. — Manchester: Univ. Press, 1989. —Р.174–186.
Fairbanks J., Davies J., Couper J., O’Brien J. The Oswestry low-back pain disability questionnaire // Physiotherapy. — 1980. — V.66. — P.271.
Fairbanks J. The Oswestry Disability Index // Spine. — 2000. — V.25, N.22. — P.2940–2953.
Fairbanks J. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire // Physiotherapy. — 1980. — V.66. — P.271.
Fisher C., Noonan V., Bishop P. et al. Outcome evaluation of the operative management of lumbar disc herniation causing sciatica // J. Neurosurg. Spine. — 2004. — V.100, N4. — P.317–324.
Hakkinen A., Ylinen J., Kautiainen H. et al. Does the outcome 2 months after lumbar disc surgery predict the outcome 12 months later? // Disabil. Rehabil. — 2003. — V.25, N17. — P.968–972.
Hawk C. Update on the Research Network: Use of the SF-36 Health Survey (RAND-36) // Palmer J. Res. — 1995. — V.2, N2. — P.32–33.
Health Outcomes Institute. Low Back Pain TyPE Specifications. — Bloomington, MN: Health Outcomes Institute, 1992.
Hudson-Cook N., Tomes-Nicholson K., Breen A. The revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire // Thesis, Anglo-European College of Chiropractic. — 1988.
Huskisson S. Measurement of pain // J. Rheumatol. — 1982. — V.9. — P.768.
Hutchinson P.J., Laing R.J., Waran V. et al. Assessing outcome in lumbar disc surgery using patient completed measures // Br. J. Neurosurg. — 2000. — V.14, N3. —P.195–199.
Izumida S., Inoue S. Assessment of treatment for low back pain // J. Jap. Orthop. Assoc., 1986. — V.60. — P.391–394.
Jensen M., Karoly P., Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods // Pain. — 1986. — V.27. —P.117.
Jensen M.P., Karoly P., O’Riordan E.F. et al. The subjective experience of actual pain: an assessment of the utility of 10 indices // Clin. J. Pain. — 1989. — V.5. — P.153.
Lawlis G.F., Cuencas R., Selby D. The development of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire for illness behaviour // Spine. — 1989. — V.14. – P.511.
Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods.// Pain. — 1975. — V.1. — P.277
Merskey H. The perception and measurement of pain // J. Psychosom. Res. — 1973. — V.17. — P.251–155.
Million R., Nilsen K., Jayson M.I.V. et al. Evaluation of lower back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports // Ann. Rheum. Dis. — 1981. — V.40. — P.449.
Price D.D. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain // Pain. — 1983. — V.17. — P.45–56.
Rainsford A.O., Cairns D., Mooney V. The pain drawing as an aid to the psychologic evaluation of patients with lower back pain // Spine. — 1974. — V.1. — P.127–134.
Roland M., Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain: Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain // Spine. — 1983. — V.8. — P.141–144.
Stewart A. The M.O.S. short form general health survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population // Med. Care. — 1988. — V.26, N7. — P.724.
Stratford P.W., Binkley J.M. Measurement properties of the RM 18: A modified version of the Roland-Morris disability scale // Spine. — 1997. — V.22. — P.2416–2421.
Tait R., Pollard C., Margolis R. et al. Pain disability index: psychometric and validity data // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. — 1987. — V.68. — P.438.
Thome R., Grimby G., Wright B.D., Linacre J.M. Rasch analysis of Visual Analog Scale measurements before and after treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome in women // Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. — 1995. — V.27. — P.145–151.
Ventafridda V., DeConno F., DiTrapani P. et al. A new method of pain quantification based on a weekly self–descriptive record of the intensity and duration of pain // Advanceds in pain research and therapy. — Proceedings of the Third World Congress on Pain / Eds. J.J. Bonica, U. Lindblom, A. Iggo.
Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: A Study of Reliability and Validity // J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. — 1991. — V.14, N7. — P.409–415.
Waddell G., Main C. Assessment of severity in low–back disorders // Spine. — 1984. — V9. — P.204.
Wright C.J., Robens-Paradise Y. Evaluations of indications and outcomes in elective surgery. — Vancouver: Richmond Health Board, 2001. — 132 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 E. I. Slynko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this Journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the Journal under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this Journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form of which it has been published by the Journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the Journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this Journal is included.
