Selective surgical reinnervationn of the axillary nerve due to supraclavicular brachial plexus injury: outcomes of 42 consecutive cases, causes of inefficacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.265680Keywords:
injury, brachial plexus, selective surgical reinnervation, nerve transfer, axillary nerveAbstract
Objective: retrospective analysis of the outcomes of selective surgical reinnervation (SSR) of the axillary nerve (Ax) in patients with supraclavicular brachial plexus injury (SBPI).
Materials and methods. Forty-two patients (mean age 31.2 years) received 25 SSR with extraplexus donor nerves (e-ND) – 9 cases of subtotal SBPI and 16 cases of complete SBPI. In 17 cases of subtotal SBPI exclusively intraplexus donor nerve (i-ND) were utilized. Twenty-nine (69%) patients received SSR in terms up to 6 months, 13 patients (31%) – in terms more than 6 months. All patients at the time of inclusion were examined neurologically, electophisilogically and in 6, 9, 15 and 17 months. Recovery of the deltoid (D) muscle was assessed on Medical Research Council Scale (MRC Scale) – effective power (Еp). Recovery of effective function (Ef) has been assessed on the basis of flexion angle in glenohumeral joint in sagittal plane.
Results. Ер of D recovered in 12 patients (28%), in terms up to 6 months - in 31%, more than 6 months – in 23%. Ep of D recovered after SSR with i-ND in 9 patients (52%), in terms up to than 6 months - in 60%, more than 6 months – in 43%. Ep of D recovered after SSR with e-ND in 3 patients (12%), in terms up to 6 months- in 16%, no recovery of Ep has been observed in terms more than 6months.
Ef of D recovered in 11 patients (26%), in terms up to 6months - in 31%, more than 6months – in 15%. Ef of D recovered after SSR with i-ND in 8 patients (53%), in terms up to 6 months - in 60%, more than 6 months – in 29%. Ep of D recovered after SSR with e-ND in 3 cases (12%), in terms up to 6months - in 16%, no recovery of Ep has been observed in terms more than 6months. Recovery of Ef of D at subtotal SBPI occurred in 10 cases (38%), regardless of whether i-ND or e-ND have been utilized. SSR with e-ND at subtotal SBPI allowed restoring Ef of D in 2 cases (22%). SSR with i-ND at subtotal SBPI allowed restoring Ef of D in 8 cases (47%). SSR at complete SBPI allowed restoring Ef of D in 1 case (6%).
Conclusions. e-ND can be utilized at complete SBPI in order to provide stability to glenohumeral joint in terms up to 6 months; i-ND should be utilized in all cases of subtotal SBPI in order to provide Ef to D in terms up to 6 months.
References
Siqueira MG, Martins RS. Surgical treatment of adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries: an overview. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011 Jun;69(3):528-35. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2011000400023
Warren J, Gutmann L, Figueroa AF Jr, Bloor BM. Electromyographic changes of brachial plexus root avulsions. J Neurosurg. 1969 Aug;31(2):137-40. doi: 10.3171/jns.1969.31.2.0137
Landi A, Copeland SA, Parry CB, Jones SJ. The role of somatosensory evoked potentials and nerve conduction studies in the surgical management of brachial plexus injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980 Nov;62-B(4):492-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.62B4.7430231
Kline DG, Happel LT. Penfield Lecture. A quarter century's experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording. Can J Neurol Sci. 1993 Feb;20(1):3-10. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100047338
Carvalho GA, Nikkhah G, Matthies C, Penkert G, Samii M. Diagnosis of root avulsions in traumatic brachial plexus injuries: value of computerized tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jan;86(1):69-76. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0069
Walker AT, Chaloupka JC, de Lotbiniere AC, Wolfe SW, Goldman R, Kier EL. Detection of nerve rootlet avulsion on CT myelography in patients with birth palsy and brachial plexus injury after trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Nov;167(5):1283-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911196
Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Takayama S. Magnetic resonance myelography in brachial plexus injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Sep;79(5):764-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b5.7679
Doi K, Otsuka K, Okamoto Y, Fujii H, Hattori Y, Baliarsing AS. Cervical nerve root avulsion in brachial plexus injuries: magnetic resonance imaging classification and comparison with myelography and computerized tomography myelography. J Neurosurg. 2002 Apr;96(3 Suppl):277-84. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.96.3.0277
Martin E, Senders JT, DiRisio AC, Smith TR, Broekman MLD. Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2018 May 1:1-13. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.JNS172068
Standardization in neurosurgery. Part 2. Neuro-oncology. Kyiv: Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, 2020. 144 p.
Moore AM. Nerve Transfers to Restore upper Extremity Function: A Paradigm Shift. Front Neurol. 2014 Mar 31;5:40. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00040
Hems T. Nerve transfers for traumatic brachial plexus injury: advantages and problems. J Hand Microsurg. 2011 Jun;3(1):6-10. doi: 10.1007/s12593-011-0031-1
Chuang DC. Brachial plexus reconstruction based on the new definition of level of injury. Injury. 2008 Sep;39 Suppl 3:S23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.05.012
Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Battaglia D. Use of long autologous nerve grafts in brachial plexus reconstruction: factors that affect the outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Nov;153(11):2231-40. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1131-1
Sakellariou VI, Badilas NK, Stavropoulos NA, Mazis G, Kotoulas HK, Kyriakopoulos S, Tagkalegkas I, Sofianos IP. Treatment options for brachial plexus injuries. ISRN Orthop. 2014 Apr 14;2014:314137. doi: 10.1155/2014/314137
Oatis CA. Kinesiology : the Mechanics and Pathomechanics of Human Movement. Third edition. Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
Matthews WB. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. J Neurol Sci. 1977;33(1-2):299.
Gates DH, Walters LS, Cowley J, Wilken JM, Resnik L. Range of Motion Requirements for Upper-Limb Activities of Daily Living. Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;70(1):7001350010p1-7001350010p10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.015487
Meyer R, Claussen GC, Oh SJ. Modified trichrome staining technique of the nerve to determine proximal nerve viability. Microsurgery. 1995;16(3):129-32. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920160302
Mackinnon SE. Nerve Surgery. New York: Thieme; 2015.
Zhang D, Varadharajan V, Bhardwaj P, Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR. Considerations in the Selection of Donor Nerves for Nerve Transfer for Reanimation of Elbow and Shoulder in Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Feb;27(1):10-21. doi: 10.1142/S242483552230002X
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexander A. Gatskiy, Ihor B. Tretyak, Vitalii I. Tsymbaliuk, Iaroslav V. Tsymbaliuk, Hao Jiang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this Journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the Journal under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this Journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form of which it has been published by the Journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the Journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this Journal is included.
