Evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of spinal cord pathology

Authors

  • E. I. Slynko Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.112357

Keywords:

патология спинного мозга, результаты хирургического лечения, качество жизни

Abstract

No abstract.

References

American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Life Support Course Student Manual. — Chicago: Amer. Coll. Surg., 1989.

American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Trauma Life Support. — Chicago: Amer. Coll. Surg., 1985.

American Spinal Injury Association: Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Patients. — Chicago: Amer. Spin. Injury Assoc., 1982.

American Spinal Injury Association: Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Patients. — Chicago, Amer. Spin. Injury Assoc., 1992.

Baker C.D., Pynsent P.B., Fairbank J.C.T. The Oswestry Disability Index revisited: Its reliability, repeatability and validity, and a comparison with the St. Thomas’s Disability Index // Back Pain: New Approaches to Education and Rehabilitation / Eds. M.O. Roland, J.R. Jenner. — Manchester: Univ. Press, 1989. —Р.174–186.

Fairbanks J., Davies J., Couper J., O’Brien J. The Oswestry low-back pain disability questionnaire // Physiotherapy. — 1980. — V.66. — P.271.

Fairbanks J. The Oswestry Disability Index // Spine. — 2000. — V.25, N.22. — P.2940–2953.

Fairbanks J. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire // Physiotherapy. — 1980. — V.66. — P.271.

Fisher C., Noonan V., Bishop P. et al. Outcome evaluation of the operative management of lumbar disc herniation causing sciatica // J. Neurosurg. Spine. — 2004. — V.100, N4. — P.317–324.

Hakkinen A., Ylinen J., Kautiainen H. et al. Does the outcome 2 months after lumbar disc surgery predict the outcome 12 months later? // Disabil. Rehabil. — 2003. — V.25, N17. — P.968–972.

Hawk C. Update on the Research Network: Use of the SF-36 Health Survey (RAND-36) // Palmer J. Res. — 1995. — V.2, N2. — P.32–33.

Health Outcomes Institute. Low Back Pain TyPE Specifications. — Bloomington, MN: Health Outcomes Institute, 1992.

Hudson-Cook N., Tomes-Nicholson K., Breen A. The revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire // Thesis, Anglo-European College of Chiropractic. — 1988.

Huskisson S. Measurement of pain // J. Rheumatol. — 1982. — V.9. — P.768.

Hutchinson P.J., Laing R.J., Waran V. et al. Assessing outcome in lumbar disc surgery using patient completed measures // Br. J. Neurosurg. — 2000. — V.14, N3. —P.195–199.

Izumida S., Inoue S. Assessment of treatment for low back pain // J. Jap. Orthop. Assoc., 1986. — V.60. — P.391–394.

Jensen M., Karoly P., Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods // Pain. — 1986. — V.27. —P.117.

Jensen M.P., Karoly P., O’Riordan E.F. et al. The subjective experience of actual pain: an assessment of the utility of 10 indices // Clin. J. Pain. — 1989. — V.5. — P.153.

Lawlis G.F., Cuencas R., Selby D. The development of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire for illness behaviour // Spine. — 1989. — V.14. – P.511.

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods.// Pain. — 1975. — V.1. — P.277

Merskey H. The perception and measurement of pain // J. Psychosom. Res. — 1973. — V.17. — P.251–155.

Million R., Nilsen K., Jayson M.I.V. et al. Evaluation of lower back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports // Ann. Rheum. Dis. — 1981. — V.40. — P.449.

Price D.D. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain // Pain. — 1983. — V.17. — P.45–56.

Rainsford A.O., Cairns D., Mooney V. The pain drawing as an aid to the psychologic evaluation of patients with lower back pain // Spine. — 1974. — V.1. — P.127–134.

Roland M., Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain: Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain // Spine. — 1983. — V.8. — P.141–144.

Stewart A. The M.O.S. short form general health survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population // Med. Care. — 1988. — V.26, N7. — P.724.

Stratford P.W., Binkley J.M. Measurement properties of the RM 18: A modified version of the Roland-Morris disability scale // Spine. — 1997. — V.22. — P.2416–2421.

Tait R., Pollard C., Margolis R. et al. Pain disability index: psychometric and validity data // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. — 1987. — V.68. — P.438.

Thome R., Grimby G., Wright B.D., Linacre J.M. Rasch analysis of Visual Analog Scale measurements before and after treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome in women // Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. — 1995. — V.27. — P.145–151.

Ventafridda V., DeConno F., DiTrapani P. et al. A new method of pain quantification based on a weekly self–descriptive record of the intensity and duration of pain // Advanceds in pain research and therapy. — Proceedings of the Third World Congress on Pain / Eds. J.J. Bonica, U. Lindblom, A. Iggo.

Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: A Study of Reliability and Validity // J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. — 1991. — V.14, N7. — P.409–415.

Waddell G., Main C. Assessment of severity in low–back disorders // Spine. — 1984. — V9. — P.204.

Wright C.J., Robens-Paradise Y. Evaluations of indications and outcomes in elective surgery. — Vancouver: Richmond Health Board, 2001. — 132 p.

Published

2007-12-08

How to Cite

Slynko, E. I. (2007). Evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of spinal cord pathology. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal, (4), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.112357

Issue

Section

To practicing physician